“A lawyer with a briefcase can steal more than a thousand men with guns.”
And today there is news of a barrister facing jail after admitting stealing £81,500 from his Chambers in Manchester. Manchester-based lawyer David Friesner, 46, admitted theft when he appeared at Leeds Crown Court for the start of his trial today – Manchester Evening News
And RollonFriday.com has news of another Manchester barrister up to no good: Top barrister done for drink driving
Unusual behaviour from M’learned friends is not confined to Manchester barristers. RollonFriday writes about an outbreak of festive hooliganism at a law firm Christmas party: Exclusive: Fight erupts at DLA Piper Christmas celebration
A pre-Christmas night out for DLA Piper staff turned into a brawl, with a senior member of staff hospitalised.
Members of the firm’s marketing department were having a few festive pints at The Gables on Moorgate when a pissed-up reveller (with no connection to the firm) tried to crash the party. After making repeated advances to female members of the group, which were ignored, he announced that “one of you is going to get my cock“. The silver tongued charmer.
And… the judges get in on the act as well…
Judge publicly reprimanded over driving ban
In the wake of my astonishment (reported below and here) at the new logo being sported by BPP Law School earlier in the week, Alex Aldridge picks up the baton, inspiring some amusing comments in his Guardian piece: Law schools should focus on student job prospects, not new logos.
After commenting on BPP’s new ‘Lion’ logo, Alex Aldridge goes on to dissect the performance of a few of the law schools taking extracts from recent Bar Standards Board reports. I have read all the BSB reports now and they make interesting reading. I plan to do an analysis next week in some detail.
Solicitor and journalist David Allen Green has an interesting piece on the recent fisting Obscenity trial: Obscenity victory
The jury at Southwark Crown Court has returned unanimous Not Guilty verdicts on each of the six charges under the Obscene Publications Act 1959 against Michael Peacock.
The prosecution failed to convince a single juror that any of the DVD material distributed by Peacock was “depraving and corrupting” under the 1959 Act. The DVDs contained sexual practices such as fisting, BDSM, and so-called “watersports” depicted between consenting adults.
It is an important case – one where the jury revealed the flaws in an out of date Obscenity act and took a more tolerant attitude to sexual behaviour among consenting adults.
Law blogger Obiter J asks the question in a thoughtful piece in Legal Week: Do we need the Obscene Publications Acts?
The UK Human Rights blog also reports: Making a Fist of It: The Law and Obscenity
The internet has become an important work and social tool for many. Adam Wagner considers the issue: Is internet access a human right?
And finally – a useful round up of some of the UK Law blogs from Shireen Smith: UK Blawg Roundup #9 – Legal Services Act and Alternative Business Structures