Law Review Guest Post: David Allen Green on The Twitter Joke Trial

Twitter Joke Trial update

BY David Allen Green, solicitor, New Statesman blogger and author of The Jack of Kent blog

In May 2010, Paul Chambers was convicted at Doncaster Magistrates’ Court of a single offence under section 127(1) of the Communications Act 2003 in respect of sending over a public electronic communications network a message of a menacing character.  He was fined £385 plus £15 “victim fee” and £500 prosecution costs.  He lost an appeal to Doncaster Crown Court in November 2010.

This “Twitter Joke Trial” case is now infamous.  The supposedly menacing message was in fact an exasperated jest.  Paul did not want an airport to be menaced.  He certainly did not want it closed, as he wanted to fly from there so as to stay with a new girlfriend.  He did not send the communication to the airport or use its formal Twitter name.  He sent it only to those of his few hundred followers who happened to have been reading his tweets at the time.  He didn’t give it another thought until, one fine day, a number of Doncaster police attended his workplace to arrest him.

The next step in the case is to appeal to the High Court using the rare procedure known as “appeal by case stated”.  This is essentially an appeal on points of law.  Paul’s appeal will be on the basis that the Magistrates’ and Crown Courts misdirected themselves as to the correct tests for “actus reus” (the culpable facts) and “mens rea” (the guilty intention) as well as misapplying Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights.  The High Court appeal should be heard later this year.  Thanks to the Twitter Joke Trial Fund  and a fund-raising and celebrity-studded concert held on Friday, Paul is now in a good position for this appeal. Ben Emmerson QC and other barristers have been able to put together a strong 32 page “skeleton argument” – a benefit which most criminal appellants do not have, let alone one who has not incurred a custodial sentence.

Why does all this matter?  This case is an outrage because it shows the casual way the British state can impose criminal liability (and Paul has now lost two jobs because of his conviction and may never be able to work as an accountant again); because it shows that the law enforcement agencies do not understand social media and also do not have senses of humour or of proportion; and because it shows that a good and decent person can, with the help of others, make a stand and say to those who wish to use the coercive power of law that such an abuse of  legal power is wrong.  Paul, like the libel defendant Simon Singh,  is a person caught up in the absurdity of how the English legal system deals with what should be a matter of simple free expression.  And like Simon he intends to use the English legal system to put things right, when previously the system has got things horribly wrong.

***

UPDATE

David Allen Green has now posted on his own blog… this important update…

Twitter Joke Trial: the case stated by Doncaster Crown Court

We shall, I hope, discuss events briefly in our Without Prejudice podcast this week.

Useful links:

Concert write-up with audio interviews

Comedian Stephen Fry has said he is “prepared to go to prison” over the “Twitter joke” trial.

4 thoughts on “Law Review Guest Post: David Allen Green on The Twitter Joke Trial

  1. Fabulous! I am so pleased that a fight back is taking place. it is one of the scariest prosecutions I have come accross and it is even more scary that it succeeded, thus ruining the subject’s career.

    Well done, David Allen Green. for supporting this case. If a donation is required to fund the High Court action then I will contribute.

  2. Isn’t it funny how these celebs pick and choose their causes. Ironically Simon Singh’s position as a “sceptical” scientist and one who took a position against an established authority seems to have raised the drawbridge and is now an established part of the machine in terms of his views on climate change.
    Of course it was support from luvvieland which helped him in his quest for “justice”. If you want to get ahead in the world get a job with the BBC and you will find yourself annointed and holier than holy.
    Funny old world.

  3. looks to me like they are doing their best to help someone with a good case. what have you done to help, paul? (if nothing, i have to say i am in the same boat, but i don’t think it gives either of us an automatic right to criticise). and the unthinking use of the term luvvie for anyone in the arts is at best lazy and at worst offensive. let’s be a bit more discriminating, please.

  4. Hello,

    I was just going through some finance related sites and blogs and came across your site (http://charonqc.wordpress.com/) too. I really found it interesting and informative. I am working and associated with many finance sites as a content writer and I write articles on various topics of Finances. I really liked the way you have presented your site. I would love to do a “Guest Post” for your site like I did for other sites without charging you a penny :)

    Some of the companies I co-author for are Community Development Financial Institutions, Oak View Law Group, Center for Community Development Investments etc. It would be great to be a part of reputed site like yours :)

    The article will be 100% original and will be published only on your site. If you want you can suggest me a topic and I ll write an article for you on that topic.

    Looking forward for a positive reply :)

    Thanks,

    Patricia Briggs
    Content Editor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>